The Future of Nuclear in Connecticut

Bryan Garcia, the President and CEO of the Connecticut Green Bank, faced a decision on whether to support the continuation or expansion of nuclear power plants in Connecticut, particularly the Millstone nuclear power plant. This decision was vital as Garcia was part of the Governor’s Council on Climate Change (GC3), responsible for shaping the state's comprehensive climate strategy aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

One option for Garcia was to support the continued or increased use of nuclear power. This option presented several potential benefits. Nuclear power plants, including Millstone, do not emit greenhouse gases during operation, which is crucial for meeting the state's 2050 emissions reduction target. Additionally, Millstone’s reactors contribute almost half of Connecticut's electricity and about 15% of the power for the New England regional grid. This substantial energy contribution could help reduce the state’s dependence on natural gas, which is a significant source of greenhouse gases, thereby aiding in achieving long-term climate goals.

However, this option also had notable downsides. There were ongoing concerns about the health and safety of operating nuclear plants, which could pose significant risks. Environmental impacts, particularly the handling of nuclear waste, were also a serious consideration. Furthermore, the financial viability of maintaining and upgrading nuclear facilities posed questions, highlighted by the early closure of another New England nuclear plant in 2019.

Garcia’s decision required a careful balance between the immediate environmental benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the long-term health, safety, and financial challenges associated with nuclear energy. The GC3’s recommendation on this matter, expected to be unveiled by early 2017, was critical in shaping Connecticut's approach to achieving its climate goals.